The text summoned by this article for intensive analysis is Chae Man-sik's 『Takryu』. This work, which accurately reproduces the actual topography of Gunsan in the 1930s, can be said to be a "novel topographic map of Gunsan in the 1930s." The problem consciousness and purpose of this article is to write the Geopolitics of Gunsan in the 1930s through the analysis of this work with this poetic and spatial background. There are two main tasks that this article has worked hard to fulfill this problem consciousness and purpose. One is to analyze the spatial representation of Gunsan, a colonial city established after forced annexation in 1910. The other is to analyze the place of the rice market, which served as an organization for the colonial exploitation of Japanese capital. In the 1930s, Gunsan's residential space clearly shows the characteristics of a typical colonial double city where spatial hierarchy or differences are clearly divided around the nation. The narrator's desperate sigh that the distance or gap is unlikely to be overcome or resolved even after 100 years clearly compresses the degree of hierarchy or difference. Through such spatial differences in representation clearly revealed in the residential areas of the two peoples, Chae Man-sik eloquently states that colonial modernity was thoroughly modernized for the Japanese. Meanwhile, Chae Man-sik sharply captures that the essence of the rice exchange which reveals the clearest place in this work, was a exploitation mechanism for Japanese capital's profit-seeking. In Chae Man-sik's view, the rice exchange at the time was not a normal rice trading market, but rather a gambling place where tricks and deception with 10% of the margin were rampant. The surrounding area also harshly criticizes that Japanese capital, backed by the protection of Japanese colonial power, was a kind of economic special zone that made it possible to legally violate the property of Koreans.